Infracción de deber y autoría - una crítica a la teoría del dominio del hecho

Urs Kindhäuser

doi:10.5354/rej.v0i14.28552

We remind our collaborators that Revista de Estudios de la Justicia maintains its reception of articles throughout the year.

In order to comply with our editorial deadlines, articles submitted before April 30 may be published in the upcoming July issue.

Duty violation and primary criminal participation. Critical approach of the doctrine of deed-control

Authors

Urs Kindhäuser Catedrático y Director del Instituto de Derecho Penal de la Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn. Profesor honorario de la Universidad de Piura. Doctor honoris causa en la Universidad de Huánuco

No. 14 (2011)

https://doi.org/10.5354/rej.v0i14.28552

Abstract

The article critically reviews the so called "doctrine of deed-control"(Tatherrschaftlehre), arguing that it cannot offer a plausible criterion for the attribution ofprimary criminal responsibility. After setting forward a different conceptual proposal,grounded on a the notions of norm, duty and action, the article examines the way inwhich such a model can help to clarify the structure of more complex forms of criminalresponsibility, including not only the complete realm of complicity but also criminalnegligence.

Keywords:

deed-control, norm, action, duty, complicity, negligence

Downloads

Altmetrics

How to Cite

Kindhäuser, U. (2011). Duty violation and primary criminal participation. Critical approach of the doctrine of deed-control. Revista De Estudios De La Justicia, (14), pp. 41–52. https://doi.org/10.5354/rej.v0i14.28552

Duty violation and primary criminal participation. Critical approach of the doctrine of deed-control

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

Downloads

Make a Submission

Language

Information

Developed By

Current Issue

indexado

publique