This article exposes four arguments on the debate about the nature and conceptual range of social intervention, understanding it equally as action, interpretation, distinction and finally as a discursive dispositive. This debate has relevance for social sciences disciplines in which intervention notion ha an important place in its theoretic-methodological structure. This review sets a counterpoint with technological perspectives that reduce intervention to action’s execution. In this way, there ir a discussion about epistemic and ontological social sciences communities’ subordination in which intervention is a hallmark.
Keywords:
social intervention, applied epistemology, arguments, complexity, discourse
Saavedra, J. (2015). Four arguments about the concept of social intervention. Cinta De Moebio. Revista De Epistemología De Ciencias Sociales, (53). Retrieved from https://monitoraraucano.uchile.cl/index.php/CDM/article/view/36718
